Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Joseph Grigely. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Joseph Grigely. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, March 30, 2020

Archive Art

Robert Boyd

Just before coronavirus shut everything down, I went to San Antonio for Novel Ideas, Blue Star Contemporary's art book fair. The keynote speaker was Julie Ault, who had been a member of the art collective Group Material from 1979 to 1996. Group Material is probably best known for the AIDS Timeline produced in 1990. They produced research-based artwork, usually very political. Listening to Ault speak got me thinking about this kind of art. I've seen examples of it many times over the years, but for whatever reason, Ault prompted me to think of it as a specific genre of art. A kind of art that doesn't, as far as I know, have a name. I've been calling it "archive art" in my mind, but if any of you know an already existing name, please let me know.



I stumbled across a workable definition while reading America Starts Here, a big art book about the work of Kate Ericson and Mel Ziegler. It's been on my "to-read" shelf for a long time, and this quarantine moment seemed like a good moment to crack it open. The first essay is by Bill Arning, written before he moved to Houston to become director of the Contemporary Art Museum. In it, he wrote:
The list of strategies Ericson and Ziegler used to make artworks seemed very unusual at the time, though today's young artists regularly employ these methods, which include the following: 1) Researching arcane areas of knowledge and pursuing a passion for the aura of the archive; 2) Using mapping and other similar ways of schematizing life; 3) Creating a system that dictates all significant visual decisions about a work's presentation; 4) Employing found elements rather than causing something new to be made; 5) Viewing the entire country as a text to be read, engaged and decoded; 6) Using natural materials, like stone, leaves, and water, as they are inflected or coded by culture; 7) Critically engaging decoration and architecture for what they reveal about society; 8) Using Americana as topic, material, or motif; 9) Engaging cultural institutions, museums, and monuments, such as the Supreme Court, libraries, and universities; 10) Investigating governmental decisions about urban space and making them public; 11) Collecting and collating found language, which can subsequently function as a kind of found poetry; 12) Using the practical business decisions of others as a structuring device for works; 13) Designing projects that exist in multiple states, each of which creates meaning; from the first research to the final use of materials; 14) Insertting delays into a process that unnaturally extends the in-between period of a simple task such as landscaping or cleaning, rendering otherwise invisible processes conspicuous and examinable; 15) Allowing works to disappear through transformation, making them cease to be "art" and instead begin to fulfill a useful function; 16) Cooperating with people outside the specific disciplines of the art world in a way that gives them a non-artistic way to participate; 17) Choosing to work with each other as collaborators.
That is quite a list! And really, I think the totality of this list only applies to Ericson and Zeigler. But I think big portions of the list apply to many of the artists who create "archive art," like Group Material.

In 2012, artist Robert Gober produced a notable example of archive art for the Whitney Biennial. He created a mini-exhibit of work by Forrest Bess. The archive part of came in vitrines devoted to Betty Parsons (Bess's gallerist) and John Money, a researcher who studied sexuality and who corresponded with Bess. This doesn't exactly fit into the approach outlined by Arning, except maybe 1) and 4). But it did require original research on Gober's part. This micro-exhibition was expanded into a major solo exhibition by the Menil Museum. Gober is not typically an archive artist--he is best known as a maker of intriguing, enigmatic objects. But he totally stepped up to the plate and knocked it out of the park in this project.

Two years later, the Biennial had another notable piece of archive art, The Gregory Battcock Archive by Joseph Grigely. Grigely serendipitously discovered a bunch of Battcock's papers in the building where he had his studio in 1992. Battcock was an art critic who appeared in several Andy Warhol films over the years and was the subject of a notable Alice Neel painting. He was murdered in 1980; the murder remains unsolved. In his statement about the work, Grigely describes the archive as a kind of portrait of Battson: "A document is both a material artifact and a node within a network of human relations. We both draw and draw out Battcock from these relations--the artists he talked with, the critics he argued with, the meals he shared, the students he taught, and the tricks with whom he had sex--they are all here, some with names, some with pseudonyms." I remember being fascinated by The Gregory Battcock Archive when I saw it at the Biennial--it was perhaps where the idea of "archive art" first lodged itself in my mind as a distinct category. That said, the problem with such art is that it doesn't have much visual interest. I'd much rather see an Alice Neel painting.


Alice Neel, David Bourdan and Gregory Battcock, 1970

The lack of visual pleasure is the biggest failing with this genre of art. But Kate Ericson and Mel Ziegler are exceptions to this airless approach. The work they did fits into Arning's schema while also being visually beautiful.


Carrie Schneider, installation at the CAMH, 2014

One local artist who has long engaged in this kind of artwork is Carrie Marie Schneider. Her exhibition, Incommensurate Mapping, at the CAMH in 2014 was a perfect example. She studied the CAMH's archives and used them to critique the CAMH in an amusingly subversive way. I wrote about this exhibit at length when it came out in two posts for this blog.

There have been other notable examples of this kind of art (loosely defined) in Houston. For example, City Council Meeting, a semi-theatrical piece of participatory artwork put on by Aaron Landsman, Mallory Catlett and Jim Findlay under the auspices of DiverseWorks at the El Dorado Ballroom in 2012, or Liz Magic Laser's Tell Me What You Want to Hear at DiverseWorks in 2012. Or Ericson and Zeigler's Red House (1979) and several other projects from the same time in Houston, as well as an installation at DiverseWorks in 1987. Obviously, DiverseWorks has been a major venue for this genre of art for several decades.

For me, this work sometimes is remarkably good. The idea of researching and presenting one's research has a natural appeal to a bookish person like me. It depends on how well the artwork is constructed and how much the artists' obsessions line up with my own. In the case of The Gregory Battcock Archive and Incommensurate Mapping, they worked for me very well indeed.



Sunday, August 24, 2014

Biting the Hand that Feeds You as Institutional Critique

Robert Boyd

When I posted the previous post, I wasn't entirely sure what it was. Now that I have seen Right Here, Right Now: Houston at the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston, featuring work by Nathaniel Donnett, Debra Barrera and Carrie Marie Schneider and spoken to Schneider about the mock interview, I have a clearer idea.


Carrie Schneider and Alex Tu, The Human Tour

The exhibit was divided into three distinct areas, one for each artist. Part of Schneider's section was sort of a greatest hits show. Leftover bits from previous works, like the Human Tour (above), Care House and Hear Our Houston, gave viewers an idea of the range of Schneider's work as well as her concerns as an artist. She is the kind of artist who places herself completely outside the realm of galleries and objects for sale. Her pieces are performances and installations, and are usually collaborative. There is a sense of social practice and of relational aesthetics at work. Much of her work involves getting under the skin of a place. The Houston metropolitan area could be said to be both her most important subject and the canvas on which she makes her artworks.

But the majority in this show was about the CAMH itself. And the interview she published the day Right Here, Right Now opened was an unofficial part of the show.


Carrie Schnieder, Balloon, 2014, custom-made ventilation equipment, hardware, and heat-sealed emergency blankets (Advisor: Gary Felix, Engineers: Lisa Augustyniak, Pietro Valsecchi)

Probably the first thing viewers notice is this giant inflated object, Balloon, which mirrors the CAMH's quadrilateral shape. The architecture of the CAMH was a starting point for much of the work Schneider assembled. She was specifically responding to a show at the CAMH from 1982 called Dreams and Schemes: Visions and Revisions for the Contemporary Arts Museum. The CAMH building was designed by Gunnar Birkerts and built in 1971. It was a bold modernist statement, all angles and sliver skin. The metal clad exterior reflected a lot of regional industrial architecture. Factories and warehouses in Houston often look like this--though usually not so sleek! The 1982 show allowed a bunch of architects, including many that were at the time building some of the hippest PoMo buildings in town (Arquitectonica and Taft Architects), to reimagine the space, whether by altering or adding to Birkerts' original design or replacing it all together.  Schneider, who was given free rein to go through the CAMH's archives, exhibits a lot of documents from this exhibit, and had some of her artistic colleagues help her to create their own versions of the CAMH.


Carrie Schneider, Pool, 2014, Foam core, cardboard, blue insulation foam, paper, theatrical gel, aluminum foil, straw, cocktail umbrella, bamboo skewers, moss, worry dolls, glue, and tempera paint, 23 ¾ x 9 ¾ x 5 inches


Carrie Schneider, Bank, 2014, Gatorboard, foam core, linoleum, carpet and cork flooring samples, aluminum, wood, coffee stirrers, plastic figurines, ribbon, gold chain, paper, artist’s tape, and ballpoint pen, 27 x 10 ¾ x 5 inches


Carrie Schneider, |||||||||||, 2014, Styrofoam Whataburger cups, foam core, and hot glue, 35 x 15 ½ x 4 ½ inches


Carrie Schneider, Stephen Kraig and Gabriel Martinez, Sand Tray, 2014, Wood, paint, sand, and figurines (supplied by Texas Art Asylum), 7' x 3.5' x 9.5"


Carrie Schnieder and Gabriel Martinez, untitled, 2014, metallic in silkscreened on metallic posterboard, nails, and paint, edition of 300 (being assembled by museum-goers)


Carrie Schnieder and Gabriel Martinez, untitled, 2014, metallic in silkscreened on metallic posterboard, nails, and paint, edition of 300 (displayed on blue V-shaped wall)

This work is playful and fun. The alternate CAMHs are utopian and aimed at play. Regina Agu created her own CAMH for the show with artist-curated shows and longer hours, for example. (Correction: Regina Agu created the pedestal for that alter-CAMH, not the model itself.) This collection of alter-CAMHs becomes almost a show within the show, as if the act of curation on Schneider's part is an artistic act. This is a trend--similar shows-within-shows have appeared at the last two Whitney Biennials, for example.

Also seen at the most recent Whitney Biennial is the act of combing through an archive and displaying it as artwork--Mark Fisher/Public Collectors exhibited a mini-archive of materials related to the life of Malachi Ritscher, a devoted collector of recordings of live experimental music and dedicated political activist; and Joseph Grigely displayed selections from the papers of Gregory Battock, an art writer/curator active in the 1960s and 70s. Grigely explicitly called this work "archives as art", describing the vitrines as "an irregular modular sculpture" (Whitney Biennial 2104 catalog).


Carrie Schneider, Barthelme Board Minutes, photocopies, adhesive tape, staples, pushpins, and highlighter pen, 94 x 156 inches 

Schneider does her own archive raiding for this show. There is a section of board meeting notes from the early 60s (when it was still the Contemporary Arts Association) when Donald Barthelme was the temporary chairman. She covers a large wall with blown up photocopies of the meeting notes, some of which are highlighted in yellow. These is a lot of discussion of the philosophy of the CAA as well as practical matters. Barthelme became temporary director shortly after the CAA fired Jermayne MacAgy and ended its relationship with the Menils, who were seen as overly domineering. His job was how to get the CAA back on its feet after losing such a powerful, skilled director and two very deep-pocketed board members. Many of the segments highlighted by Schneider deal with such issues of the CAA being artistically relevant as well as operationally and financially healthy.

Much of the discussion centered around Barthelme's exhibit New American Artifacts: The Ugly Show (1960). Hiding Man: A Biography of Donald Barthelme describes the show as work that "Don collected from pawnshops, antique stores, and the banks of Buffalo Bayou [...] 'cultural objects of ambivalent status.'" The board questioned whether objects like brass knuckles belonged in a museum.

The photocopies are hard to read. Some are fuzzy and the ones on the highest level are too far from viewers (this viewer at least) to be legible. But despite this, the gist can be understood. It's a nice piece of local art history and it makes sense that Schneider would include these documents. But the thing here is that this isn't just a trip down memory lane--Schneider is using the CAMH's past to comment on its present. While the CAMH has put on some adventurous exhibits in the past few years, nothing has been as challenging as New American Artifacts: The Ugly Show. Everything the CAMH has shown since at least 2009 has been work that fits comfortably into what the art world would accept as art. Nothing really falls outside the art world consensus space or is even liminal. For example, the homme moyen sensuel might have found the Joan Jonas/Gina Pane or Glenn Fogel exhibits incomprehensible, but not a denizen of the art world.


Carrie Schnieder, Archival materials related to key moments in CAMH's history (1960-1973); Gunnar Birkert's building design (1967-72); Sebastian "Lefty" Adler's tenure aas Director of CAMH (1966-1972), copies of newspaper and magazine articles, photocopies, and offset print catalogues

Another wall contains framed magazine and newspaper clippings. These are interviews with Sebastian "Lefty" Adler, director of the CAMH from 1966 to 1973, and they tell a story of a very different CAMH. I read these clippings again as a rebuke from the CAMH of the past to the CAMH of today. Because Adler was the director of the museum and was making statements that seem quite radical, this installation by Schneider seems specifically to be calling out current CAMH director Bill Arning.

Schneider constructed a synthetic interview by stringing together various quotes from Adler. She presented as an interview with "CAMH's director," presumably so people would initially read it as an interview with Bill Arning. Schneider told me that the reason she created this fake Glasstire post was that people are more likely to read a blog post than to read a clipping framed and placed on a wall. You can go read the interview in full, but here are a few key quotes:
Museums and art centers are so preoccupied with exhibitions that they tend to forget the artists. We do not intend to make the museum a sacred temple. We mean to research new ideas. For too long now, we in the museums have considered the artist merely as a commodity to be used, but the artist today is someone who uses [their] imagination to produce something more than just an object to be collected.
This museum cannot be either an Acropolis or a country club and it won’t be.  
The education department has been a dirty word in museums, but public school teachers are vitally important. I’ve got to take time to meet with teachers and find out what their kids want and need, and not just send them a lot of stuff they don’t need. I want to get this museum involved with college students, too. Let them install shows and get them working directly with artists. It is not Culture on a Corner. We plan to bring visiting artists and to take a role in the development of the whole city, by bringing statements, via exhibitions, about urban development. One day art forms will be flowing out TO people rather than being collected IN what we now think of as museums. Art can’t be divorced from people. Art is society and society is art. Art today moves out of museums and into the whole city.
Artists today aren’t interested in selling works to collectors – at least, not the artists I want to work with. This will enable an artist to come in here and use the museum, not just show in it. We’ve got to put the human thing back into our museums, and the only people who can do it are artists.
These are all things Adler said in the early 70s. (That said, it has to be remembered that what Adler showed lots of art by artists who were more than happy to sell their work to collectors.)

By creating a guerrilla fake interview with the "CAMH's director," Schneider was engaging in deconstructive criticism of the institution and its director. Museums and the art world are often the target of criticism--down in Galveston the day after Right Here, Right Now: Houston opened at the CAMH, William Powhida and Jade Townsend presented an ambitious installation, New New Berlin and Nevada Art Fair at the Galveston Artist Residency. It was critical of many aspects of the art world, including Bill Arning, to whom was assigned the role of mayor of New New Berlin. (Not a good weekend for Arning, no?)

I find Powhida's sarcastic dissections of the art world extremely amusing, and I like Mark Flood's savage take-downs as well. But these are blunt hammer blows compared to the surgical precision of Schneider's work. She expertly slipped a stiletto into the CAMH's ribcage without the CAMH even noticing, and even more astonishing is that she borrowed the stiletto from the CAMH itself. Schneider was the proverbial treacherous house guest. The only artist I can think of who has done something comparable is Hans Haacke. (I introduced Hyperallergic editor Hrag Vartanian to Carrie Schneider at the New New Berlin opening, and he congratulated her on her "Haacke hack." Damn, I wish I had said that.)

How did Arning respond? Very diplomatically. On Glasstire, he wrote "I wish I had said them but they are all from the legendary directors of CAMH’s first years in this building. The collapsing of time and the timelessness of these issues is pretty fascinating. Good piece." On a Facebook post, he commented "I would be happy if these were my quotes but if you follow the link they are from legendary earlier CAMH directors from the first years in this building. Its a cool piece in every way." What else could he say?

Schneider told me that she had written fake Glasstire post a month and a half before the show opened. She patiently sat on it until the day of the opening. She had access to Glasstire because she had been a contributor in that past. (Needless to say, Schneider's posting privileges have since been revoked.) She couldn't post to the front page of the well-known Texas online art magazine, but her post was visible if you knew the URL. She sent the URL out to several people and let the propagating qualities of social media do the rest for her.

Schneider is critical of the CAMH that is, and she has a vision of what the CAMH could be--her vision is related to Barthelme's vision and Adler's vision. The question is, will anything change? I am dubious--time institutionalizes institutions. Sclerosis sets in. The CAMH serves a purpose as it is. To me, it seems up to others to create new institutions or frameworks to operate in the ways Adler described. What the CAMH no longer does (if they ever did), Project Row Houses does. (And what PRH doesn't do, Alabama Song might.) It seems unlikely that the CAMH will ever be a radical institution again at this stage in its existence. Not impossible, but unlikely. Nonetheless, it was truly a pleasure to witness Schneider's masterful ninja attack on the very institution housing her exhibit.

Wednesday, October 28, 2020

Robert Boyd's Book Report: It Has Only Just Begun

 Robert Boyd


This book, It Has Only Just Begun, is basically a pamphlet published by Printed Matter. It contains a panel discussion held at the Art Book Fair from 2008. The introduction is by A.A. Bronson, the interviewer is Hans Ulrich Olbrich, and the interview is with Joseph Grigely and Rirkrit Titavanija.

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Even More Art From Frieze (some NSFW)

Robert Boyd


Adriana Lara, Os verdadeiros artistas estão nas ruas, 2012, inkjet on canvas, 20 x 40 cm at Air de Paris

Os verdadeiros artistas estão nas ruas. "The real artists are in the streets." In other words, what the hell are you dong here at Frieze? Well, despite the fashionable people and luxurious surroundings, there was a lot of art to see. I've written about some of it. Here's some more, mostly presented without comment.


Eddie Peake at Lorcan O'Neill

Not sure what this one is called, but I imagined buying it to hang in the lobby of The Great God Pan Is Dead Enterprises.


Eddie Peake, Tangling in Hair, 2013, two black and whire posters and three oil on wood paintings, 42 x 95 x 1 inch at White Cube

Eddie Peake had strikingly different work at different galleries.


Agnieszka Kurant, Archive of Phantom Islands, 2011, pigment print on archival paper, polyptych of 30, 36.5 x 28 cm at Galeria Fortes Vilaça


Agnieszka Kurant, Archive of Phantom Islands (detail), 2011, pigment print on archival paper, polyptych of 30, 36.5 x 28 cm at Galeria Fortes Vilaça

Agnieszka Kurant's Archive of Phantom Islands is the kind of art that appeals to nerdy fans of Ian Hamilton Finlay and Jorge Luis Borges (like me).


Alex Schweder at Jack Hanley


Alice Channer, various pieces, 2013, cast, pigmented polyurethane resin at The Approach


Alicja Kwade, heavy weight of light, 2012, wood, bronze, copper, brass, stailess steel, mirror, MDF, approximately 118 x 240 x 80 inches


Carsten Höller at Massimo de Carlo


Cornelia Parker, Endless Sugar, 2011, 30 pieces of silver plate flattenned by a 250 ton industria; press, 165.4 x 9.8 inches


David Shrigley at Anton Kern


Djordje Ozbolt, Les Objects Mystique Plastique, 2013, dyed polyester resin, 85 x 50.3 7.8 inches at Herald St.


Elmgreen & Dragset, I Will Never See You Again, 2009, mixed media

I Will Never See You Again by Elmgreen and Dragset: art for ex-lovers. My friend DC is caught in the reflection.


Ernesto Neto, Splasmiopylea, 2003, polyamide textile, stryofoam beads, wooden pegs, 120 x 217 x 3 inches at Tanya Bonaker Gallery

One of my favorites.


Gimhongsok, Material, 2012, cast resin at Kukje Gallery


Joseph Grigely, That's What We Live For, 2007, crystal urethane, 36 1/2x 32 x 33


Jenny Holzer, Heap, 2012, array of 7 LED signs with stainless steel housing: 3 with blue & red diodes on front, amber and blue diodes on back, 104.8 x 95 x 95 inches


Jenny Scobel, Mr. Wilson's Wife, 2013, oil, pencil, watercolor on vellum, 121.9 x 81.3 cm, at Zeno X Gallery


Jenny Scobel, untitled, 2013, mixed media on vellum, 109.5 x 83 cm, at Zeno X Gallery

These two portraits by Jenny Scobel are powerfully sexy; there is something strange and attractive about the nearly identical deadpan expressions on her face.


Jeremy Diller, A Range Rover crushed and made into a bench, 2012, Silkscreen print on paper, dimensions variable


Jon Pestoni, Hostages, 2013, oil on canvas, 103 x 78 x 2 inches at David Kordansky Gallery


KAWS, NTY, 2012, acrylic on canvas, 60 inch diameter


Kendell Geers, Bladerunner XIV, 2012, mild steel and razormesh, 120 x 51 x 51 cm

"Oh look, dear. This Kendell Geers would be perfect for the nursery!"


Liam Gillick, ...And Upheaval, 2012, powder coated aluminum, 74.8 x 98.4 x3.9 inches


Lily Van Der Stokker at Susanne Vielmetter Los Angeles Projects


Lynda Benglis, Eat Meat, 1969/75, aluminum, 24 x 80 x 50 inches at Cheim & Read

The fact that I accidentally juxtaposed those two very shapely legs with Lynda Benglis's sculpture Eat Meat has absolutely no psychological subtext, so get that thought out of your dirty mind.


Mathieu Mercir, untitled, 2012, acrylic on canvas, 55 inches diameter at Mehdi Chouakri


Matthieu Mercier, untitled, 2011-2012, steel structure, 2 cylinders of carpet, 77 x 200 x 77 cm at Mehdi Chouakri


Matthew Day Jackson, Domestic Space (in Space), 2013, burned wood, formica, mirror plexiglass on panel, stainless steel frame, 97.5 x 97.5 inches at Hauser & Wirth


Naama Tsabar at Dvir Gallery


Naama Tsabar (detail) at Dvir Gallery



Nick Cave, Soundsuit,  2011, mixed media including fabric, vintage toys, seesaw and mannequin, 144 x 166 x 45 inches


Nina Canell, Salt Sings, 2013, steel pipes, cable, marble, neon, 3000V, salt, water at Mother's Tankstation


Paul McCarthy, White Snow at Hauser & Wirth


Paul McCarthy, White Snow at Hauser & Wirth


Paul McCarthy, Balloon Dog, 2013, sealed PVC plastic, fan at Hauser & Wirth


Penny Slinger, Bride in the Bath-Film, 1969, 16 mm transfer to DVD, b&w and color; Bride in the Bath II, 1969/2013, life-cast based assemblage sculpture, fiberglass, silk, resin and bathtub at Air de Paris


Raymond Pettibon at Meyer Kainer


Rodney Graham, Sunday Sun, 1937, 2012, transparency in lightbox, 34.6 x 34.6 x 7 inches at Lisson Gallery


Rodney Graham, Sunday Sun (detail), 1937, 2012, transparency in lightbox, 34.6 x 34.6 x 7 inches

For a fan of old comic strips like me, Rodney Graham's Sunday Sun was a wonderful photo.


Roman Signer, Stühle mit Raketen, wooden chairs, copper, fireworks at Galerie Martin Janda


Ryan McGinley, India (Frost), 2013, c-print, 72 x 108 inches at Team Gallery


Sam Falls at T293


Sam Falls at T293

I love these colorful geometric sculptures by Sam Falls, but what really makes them great are the painted angle braces.


Sarnath Banerjee, Temporary Autonomous Zones (from a set of 9), ink and brush on paper, 11 x 6.5 inches at Project 88


Sarnath Banerjee, Temporary Autonomous Zones (from a set of 9), ink and brush on paper, 11 x 6.5 inches at Project 88


Sarnath Banerjee, Temporary Autonomous Zones (from a set of 9), ink and brush on paper, 11 x 6.5 inches at Project 88


Sean Landers at International Art Objects Galleries


Vik Muniz, The Stone Breakers, after Gustave Courbet (Pictures of Magazines 2), 2013, digital c-print at Sikkema Jenkins


Sue Williams, Deflate, 2013, oil and acrylic on canvas, 74 x 134 inches at 303 Gallery

I think Sue Williams's Deflate was my favorite piece in the whole show.


Share